linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Introduce IIO interface for fingerprint sensors

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54930604.1020607@metafoo.de>
Date:	Thu, 18 Dec 2014 17:51:16 +0100
From:	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
To:	"Baluta, Teodora" <teodora.baluta@...el.com>,
	"jic23@...nel.org" <jic23@...nel.org>
CC:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-iio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
	Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@...sung.com>,
	linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Introduce IIO interface for fingerprint sensors

Adding V4L folks to Cc for more input.

On 12/08/2014 03:10 PM, Baluta, Teodora wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Vi, 2014-12-05 at 02:15 +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>> On 04/12/14 13:00, Teodora Baluta wrote:
>>> This patchset adds support for fingerprint sensors through the IIO interface.
>>> This way userspace applications collect information in a uniform way. All
>>> processing would be done in the upper layers as suggested in [0].
>>>
>>> In order to test out this proposal, a minimal implementation for UPEK's
>>> TouchChip Fingerprint Sensor via USB is also available. Although there is an
>>> existing implementation in userspace for USB fingerprint devices, including this
>>> particular device, the driver represents a proof of concept of how fingerprint
>>> sensors could be integrated in the IIO framework regardless of the used bus. For
>>> lower power requirements, the SPI bus is preferred and a kernel driver
>>> implementation makes more sense.
>>
>> So why not v4l?  These are effectively image sensors..
>
> Well, here's why I don't think v4l would be the best option:
>
> - an image scanner could be implemented in the v4l subsystem, but it
> seems far more complicated for a simple fingerprint scanner - it usually
> has drivers for webcams, TVs or video streaming devices. The v4l
> subsystem (with all its support for colorspace, decoders, image
> compression, frame control) seems a bit of an overkill for a very
> straightforward fingerprint imaging sensor.
>
> - a fingerprint device could also send out a processed information, not
> just the image of a fingerprint. This means that the processing is done
> in hardware - the UPEK TouchStrip chipset in libfprint has this behavior
> (see [0]). So, the IIO framework would support a uniform way of handling
> fingerprint devices that either do processing in software or in
> hardware.
>
> The way I see it now, for processed fingerprint information, an IIO
> device could have an IIO_FINGERPRINT channel with a modifier and only
> the sensitivity threshold attribute set. We would also need two
> triggers: one for enrollment and one for the verification mode to
> control the device from a userspace application.
>
> Thanks,
> Teodora
>
> [0] http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/fprint/libfprint/upekts/
>
>
>>>
>>> A sysfs trigger is enabled and the device starts scanning. As soon as an image
>>> is available it is written in the character device /dev/iio:deviceX.
>>>
>>> Userspace applications will be able to calculate the expected image size using
>>> the fingerprint attributes height, width and bit depth. Other attributes
>>> introduced for the fingerprint channel in IIO represent information that aids in
>>> the fingerprint image processing. Besides these, the proposed interface offers
>>> userspace a way to read a feedback after a scan (like the swipe was too slow or
>>> too fast) through a modified fingerprint_status channel.
>>>
>>> [0] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-iio/msg11463.html
>>>
>>> Teodora Baluta (3):
>>>    iio: core: add support for fingerprint devices
>>>    iio: core: change channel's storagebits/realbits to u32
>>>    iio: fingerprint: add fingerprint sensor via USB
>>>
>>>   Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-iio |  51 +++
>>>   drivers/iio/Kconfig                     |   1 +
>>>   drivers/iio/Makefile                    |   1 +
>>>   drivers/iio/fingerprint/Kconfig         |  15 +
>>>   drivers/iio/fingerprint/Makefile        |   5 +
>>>   drivers/iio/fingerprint/fp_tc.c         | 162 +++++++++
>>>   drivers/iio/fingerprint/fp_tc.h         |  22 ++
>>>   drivers/iio/fingerprint/fp_tc_usb.c     | 618 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>   drivers/iio/fingerprint/fp_tc_usb.h     | 144 ++++++++
>>>   drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c         |   9 +
>>>   include/linux/iio/iio.h                 |  11 +-
>>>   include/linux/iio/types.h               |  10 +
>>>   12 files changed, 1047 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>   create mode 100644 drivers/iio/fingerprint/Kconfig
>>>   create mode 100644 drivers/iio/fingerprint/Makefile
>>>   create mode 100644 drivers/iio/fingerprint/fp_tc.c
>>>   create mode 100644 drivers/iio/fingerprint/fp_tc.h
>>>   create mode 100644 drivers/iio/fingerprint/fp_tc_usb.c
>>>   create mode 100644 drivers/iio/fingerprint/fp_tc_usb.h
>>>
>>
>
> N�����r��y���b�X��ǧv�^�)޺{.n�+����{��*"��^n�r���z�.��h����&��.�G���h�.(�階�ݢj"��.�.m�����z�ޖ���f���h���~�mml==
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/