[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8832.1418930473@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 14:21:13 -0500
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
Cc: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
selinux@...ho.nsa.gov, linux-audit@...hat.com, rgb@...hat.com
Subject: Re: linux-next 20141216 BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/slab.c:2849
On Thu, 18 Dec 2014 11:50:20 -0500, Eric Paris said:
> On Thu, 2014-12-18 at 11:45 -0500, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu wrote:
> > On Tue, 16 Dec 2014 20:09:54 -0500, Valdis Kletnieks said:
> >
> > > Spotted these two while booting single-user on 20141216. 20141208
> > > doesn't throw these, so it's something in the last week or so..
> >
> > Gaah! Turns out that 20141208 *is* susceptible - it had been booting
> > just fine for several days, but it went around the bend, apparently due
> > to a userspace or initrd change.
>
> $5 says you updated systemd?
Actually, yeah. yum.log says:
Dec 12 14:08:09 Updated: systemd-218-1.fc22.x86_64
and things started going downhill that evening. Damned if I know what 218
was doing to cause the issues. (Other RPM update that looked vaguely
related was for selinux-policy, but again, damned if I know what a policy
file could contain that would change the behavior...)
Is it worth backing it to -217, or do we have a handle on the issue and
systemd is just the messenger?
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists