[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54935842.5020507@oracle.com>
Date:	Thu, 18 Dec 2014 15:42:10 -0700
From:	Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@...cle.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC:	tglx@...utronix.de, corbet@....net, mingo@...hat.com,
	hpa@...or.com, riel@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	rientjes@...gle.com, ak@...ux.intel.com, mgorman@...e.de,
	raistlin@...ux.it, kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com,
	atomlin@...hat.com, avagin@...nvz.org, gorcunov@...nvz.org,
	serge.hallyn@...onical.com, athorlton@....com, oleg@...hat.com,
	vdavydov@...allels.com, daeseok.youn@...il.com,
	keescook@...omium.org, yangds.fnst@...fujitsu.com,
	sbauer@....utah.edu, vishnu.ps@...sung.com, axboe@...com,
	paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v4] sched/fair: Add advisory flag for borrowing
 a timeslice
On 12/18/2014 03:28 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 11:44:19AM -0700, Khalid Aziz wrote:
>> sched/fair: Add advisory flag for borrowing a timeslice
>
> yuck hatred and much of that.
>
> Also, you fail to explain why a kernel side spin futex-lock is not an
> option.
>
I had explained that when this question came up in the last round of 
discussions. The queuing problem I am trying to solve stems from 
userspace locks. Java and databases implement their own userspace locks 
that do not use futex. Solving this with futex will not help the primary 
users of this solution.
Hope this helps.
Thanks,
Khalid
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
