| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 15:06:04 -0800 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> To: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] stable_kernel_rules: reorganize and update submission options On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 02:55:53PM -0800, Brian Norris wrote: > The current organization of Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt > doesn't clearly differentiate the mutually exclusive options for > submission to the -stable review process. As I understand it, patches > are not actually required to be mailed directly to > stable@...r.kernel.org, but the instructions do not make this clear. > > Also, there are some established processes that are not listed -- > specifically, what I call Option 2 below. > > This patch updates and reorganizes a bit, to make things clearer. > > Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com> > --- > v2: add some more items to Option 2 to suit Greg's liking > > Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- > 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) Looks good, I'll queue this up after 3.19-rc1 is out. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists