[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54943E99.5060206@itdev.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 15:04:57 +0000
From: Nick Dyer <nick.dyer@...ev.co.uk>
To: Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
CC: Yufeng Shen <miletus@...gle.com>,
Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@...omium.org>,
Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@...omail.se>,
Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@...sung.com>,
Alan Bowens <Alan.Bowens@...el.com>,
"linux-input@...r.kernel.org" <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Meerwald <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
Olof Johansson <olofj@...omium.org>,
Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Chung-yih Wang <cywang@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Input: atmel_mxt_ts - implement T100 touch object support
Hi Benson-
On 18/12/14 18:49, Benson Leung wrote:
> Dmitry and Chung-Yih have had some discussion about how to handle
> hovering fingers, and I think the direction they wanted to go was to
> use ABS_MT_DISTANCE instead.
>
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-input/msg33950.html
Thanks for flagging this up. The patch I submitted is written against the
Android touch devices spec, which treats ABS_MT_PRESSURE being zero as
hover, but indeed currently the handling of BTN_TOUCH when using
input_mt_report_pointer_emaultion() won't be quite right.
I will have a look at straightening this out and re-post.
cheers
Nick
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists