lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 19 Dec 2014 07:41:47 -0800
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Eduardo Barretto <edusbarretto@...il.com>
Cc:	devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Staging: wlan-ng: hfa384x_usb: fixed an 'else'
 statement coding style issue

On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 12:18:26AM -0200, Eduardo Barretto wrote:
> Checkpatch was complaining about the else statement because the if statement had a return '1' call. Taking a look at the function which this else statement belongs, you can see that it has an switch case statement.
> The main idea of the function is to return '1' if you get into any of the cases (including the default case where the "problematic" if/else statement is declared).
> If any of the cases is not sufficient the function should return '0', so the else statement that checkpath was complaining could be removed, and what was done inside this else statement can be done outside the switch case statement and then we return '0'.
> This way we have a cleaner code and no checkpatch error complaints.

Verbose is good, but please wrap your lines at 72 columns.  And this
might have been a bit too verbose :)

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ