[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201412191951.25562@pali>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 19:51:25 +0100
From: Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu,
Steven Honeyman <stevenhoneyman@...il.com>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>,
Gabriele Mazzotta <gabriele.mzt@...il.com>,
Jochen Eisinger <jochen@...guin-breeder.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] i8k: Autodetect maximal fan speed and fan RPM multiplier
On Friday 19 December 2014 19:32:37 Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > -static int i8k_fan_mult;
> > -static int i8k_pwm_mult;
> > -static int i8k_fan_max = I8K_FAN_HIGH;
> > +static int i8k_fan_mult[2];
> > +static int i8k_pwm_mult[2];
> > +static int i8k_fan_max[2];
>
> The rationale for this change is not explained in the commit
> log.
>
> Do you have any indication that those values would ever be
> different for the two fans, ie that you actually need arrays
> here ?
>
I do not know... But if we decide to use only single value for
multiplier and max value which fan to use for autodetection?
> > @@ -271,8 +274,25 @@ static int i8k_get_fan_speed(int fan)
> >
> > {
> >
> > struct smm_regs regs = { .eax = I8K_SMM_GET_SPEED, };
> >
> > + if (fan < 0 || fan >= ARRAY_SIZE(i8k_fan_mult))
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
>
> This range check (and probably others) is still unnecessary.
>
> Guenter
>
No, it is necessary. Function i8k_get_fan_speed is called from
ioctl callback with value which comes from userspace. If
userspace specify fan out of that array we can get kernel panic.
> > regs.ebx = fan & 0xff;
> >
> > - return i8k_smm(®s) ? : (regs.eax & 0xffff) *
> > i8k_fan_mult; + return i8k_smm(®s) ? : (regs.eax &
> > 0xffff) * i8k_fan_mult[fan]; +}
--
Pali Rohár
pali.rohar@...il.com
Download attachment "signature.asc " of type "application/pgp-signature" (199 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists