linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] drm_modes: add videomode_from_drm_display

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <54947695.3020108@gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 19 Dec 2014 19:03:49 +0000
From:	Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@...il.com>
To:	Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
	Steve Longerbeam <slongerbeam@...il.com>
CC:	emil.l.velikov@...il.com,
	Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@...escale.com>,
	linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Steve Longerbeam <steve_longerbeam@...tor.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
	Denis Carikli <denis@...rea.com>,
	Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>,
	Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>,
	Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@...osoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] drm_modes: add videomode_from_drm_display_mode

On 19/12/14 11:03, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 18.12.2014, 18:00 -0800 schrieb Steve Longerbeam:
>> Add conversion from drm_display_mode to videomode.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Steve Longerbeam <steve_longerbeam@...tor.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c |   40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  include/drm/drm_modes.h     |    2 ++
>>  2 files changed, 42 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c
>> index 6d8b941..583a391 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c
>> @@ -615,6 +615,46 @@ void drm_display_mode_from_videomode(const struct videomode *vm,
>>  }
>>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(drm_display_mode_from_videomode);
>>  
>> +/**
>> + * videomode_from_drm_display_mode - fill in @vm using @dmode,
>> + * @dmode: drm_display_mode structure to use as source
>> + * @vm: videomode structure to use as destination
>> + *
>> + * Fills out @vm using the display mode specified in @dmode.
>> + */
>> +void videomode_from_drm_display_mode(const struct drm_display_mode *dmode,
>> +				     struct videomode *vm)
>> +{
>> +	vm->hactive = dmode->hdisplay;
>> +	vm->hfront_porch = dmode->hsync_start - dmode->hdisplay;
>> +	vm->hsync_len = dmode->hsync_end - dmode->hsync_start;
>> +	vm->hback_porch = dmode->htotal - dmode->hsync_end;
>> +
>> +	vm->vactive = dmode->vdisplay;
>> +	vm->vfront_porch = dmode->vsync_start - dmode->vdisplay;
>> +	vm->vsync_len = dmode->vsync_end - dmode->vsync_start;
>> +	vm->vback_porch = dmode->vtotal - dmode->vsync_end;
>> +
>> +	vm->pixelclock = dmode->clock * 1000;
>> +
>> +	vm->flags = 0;
>> +	if (dmode->flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_PHSYNC)
>> +		vm->flags |= DISPLAY_FLAGS_HSYNC_HIGH;
>> +	else if (dmode->flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_NHSYNC)
>> +		vm->flags |= DISPLAY_FLAGS_HSYNC_LOW;
>> +	if (dmode->flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_PVSYNC)
>> +		vm->flags |= DISPLAY_FLAGS_VSYNC_HIGH;
>> +	else if (dmode->flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_NVSYNC)
>> +		vm->flags |= DISPLAY_FLAGS_VSYNC_LOW;
>> +	if (dmode->flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_INTERLACE)
>> +		vm->flags |= DISPLAY_FLAGS_INTERLACED;
>> +	if (dmode->flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_DBLSCAN)
>> +		vm->flags |= DISPLAY_FLAGS_DOUBLESCAN;
>> +	if (dmode->flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_DBLCLK)
>> +		vm->flags |= DISPLAY_FLAGS_DOUBLECLK;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(videomode_from_drm_display_mode);
> 
> Is it ok for drm_modes to export a function that doesn't start with
> drm_ ? We could just rename this to drm_display_mode_to_videomode if
> necessary. I can fix it up as I apply it, but I'd like to know which is
> preferred.
> 
Non-native English speaker here, and drm_display_mode_to_videomode
sounds better. Plus I think that *to* functions are more common than
*from* ones.

I'm not a drm dev, so just my 2c :)

Cheers,
Emil

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/