linux-kernel - Re: frequent lockups in 3.18rc4

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+55aFzt_4Zrnek6381JFzm+3iV9d=JAeyx+=E9F8BeiWFb56g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 19 Dec 2014 12:46:16 -0800
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>, Chris Mason <clm@...com>,
	Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Dâniel Fraga <fragabr@...il.com>,
	Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Suresh Siddha <sbsiddha@...il.com>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	Peter Anvin <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: frequent lockups in 3.18rc4

On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> I do note that we depend on the "new mwait" semantics where we do
> mwait with interrupts disabled and a non-zero RCX value. Are there
> possibly even any known CPU errata in that area? Not that it sounds
> likely, but still..

Remind me what CPU you have in that machine again? The %rax value for
the mwait cases in question seems to be 0x32, which is either C7s-HSW
or C7s-BDW, and in both cases has the "TLB flushed" flag set.

I'm pretty sure you have a Haswell, I'm just checking. Which model?
I'm assuming it's family 6, model 60, stepping 3? I found you
mentioning i5-4670T in a perf thread.. That the one?

Anyway, I don't actually believe in any CPU bugs, but you could try
"intel_idle.max_cstate=0" and see if that makes any difference, for
example.

Or perhaps just "intel_idle.max_cstate=1", which leaves intel_idle
active, but gets rid of the deeper sleep states (that incidentally
also play games with leave_mm() etc)

                            Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/