| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <BLUPR07MB4845BEE1160E5945E113E8AFE6B0@BLUPR07MB484.namprd07.prod.outlook.com> Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 02:34:24 +0000 From: "Chickles, Derek" <Derek.Chickles@...iumnetworks.com> To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> CC: "apw@...onical.com" <apw@...onical.com>, "computersforpeace@...il.com" <computersforpeace@...il.com>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "cernekee@...il.com" <cernekee@...il.com> Subject: RE: [PATCH] checkpatch: Fix MAINTAINERS search pattern > On Thu, 2014-12-18 at 12:12 -0800, Derek Chickles wrote: > > This fixes the check that was supposed to prevent the MAINTAINERS > > warning from appearing when you run checkpatch.pl on a patch that > > includes new files/directories and an updated MAINTAINERS file. > > This suggested patch doesn't work. > > $realfile isn't set until the file shows up > in the patch itself. > > The current test looks at the changelog > before the files are modified and is correct. > Thanks, you're right. My mistake was trying to run checkpatch.pl on a diff. My patch works on diffs while the original code does not. This is by chance really because MAINTAINERS is early in the patch. Using format-patch on something that is committed is clearly the correct solution. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists