[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5497E41F.50301@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 10:27:59 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: "Wu, Feng" <feng.wu@...el.com>,
"Zhang, Yang Z" <yang.z.zhang@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, Gleb Natapov <gleb@...nel.org>,
"dwmw2@...radead.org" <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
"joro@...tes.org" <joro@...tes.org>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Jiang Liu <jiang.liu-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@...lic.gmane.org>
CC: "iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
KVM list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Eric Auger <eric.auger@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [v3 13/26] KVM: Define a new interface kvm_find_dest_vcpu() for
VT-d PI
On 22/12/2014 05:48, Wu, Feng wrote:
> Do you mean we don't support Lowest priority interrupts? As I mentioned before,
> Lowest priority interrupts is widely used in Linux, so I think supporting lowest priority
> interrupts is very important for Linux guest OS. Do you have any ideas/suggestions about
> how to support Lowest priority interrupts for PI? Thanks a lot!
Can you support them only if the destination is a single CPU?
Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists