[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1412221420170.11431@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 14:21:35 -0800 (PST)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
cc: Rafael Aquini <aquini@...hat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
oleg@...hat.com, linux-mm@...ck.org, Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] proc: task_mmu: show page size in
/proc/<pid>/numa_maps
On Mon, 22 Dec 2014, Dave Hansen wrote:
> > Remaining question here is: should we print out 'pagesize' deliberately
> > or conditionally, only to disambiguate cases where page_size != PAGE_SIZE?
>
> I say print it unconditionally. Not to completely overdesign this, but
> I do think we should try to at least mirror the terminology that smaps uses:
>
> KernelPageSize: 4 kB
> MMUPageSize: 4 kB
>
> So definitely call this kernelpagesize.
>
Feel free to add my acked-by if this patch prints it unconditionally and
renames this to kernelpagesize per Dave. I agree we need to leave "huge"
for existing dependencies even though we have multiple possible hugepage
sizes.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists