[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54989F8C.3030602@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 23:47:40 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Cleaning up the KVM clock
On 22/12/2014 17:03, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
> This is wrong. The guest *kernel* might not see the intermediate
> state because the kernel (presumably it disabled migration while
> reading pvti), but the guest vdso can't do that and could very easily
> observe pvti while it's being written.
No. kvm_guest_time_update is called by vcpu_enter_guest, while the vCPU
is not running, so it's entirely atomic from the point of view of the guest.
> I'll send patches for the whole mess, complete with lots of comments,
> after I test them a bit today.
Ok, some comments can certainly help the discussion.
Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists