[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5498A137.6020707@lurklurk.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 17:54:47 -0500
From: David Drysdale <dmd@...klurk.org>
To: David Drysdale <drysdale@...gle.com>, schwab@...ux-m68k.org,
geert@...ux-m68k.org
CC: shuahkh@....samsung.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH selftest fails!] m68k: Wire up execveat
[Re-send from a different email address because I apparently can't send
plaintext from gMail on my phone.]
On 21 Dec 2014 09:37, "Andreas Schwab" <schwab@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
>
> Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> writes:
>
> > Check success of execveat(5,
> 'xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx...yyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy', 0)... [FAIL] (child 792
> exited with 126 not 127)
>
> POSIX says
> (http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/V3_chap02.html#tag_18_08_02):
>
> If a command is not found, the exit status shall be 127. If the
> command name is found, but it is not an executable utility, the exit
> status shall be 126.
>
> Andreas.
>
That sounds like a bit of a grey area -- is ENAMETOOLONG nearer to
ENOENT or EACCES? Maybe it's best to make the test allow either (given
that it's not a test of shell behaviour).
I can update the test to do that, but it probably won't be until the new
year I'm afraid.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists