lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 22 Dec 2014 17:54:47 -0500
From:	David Drysdale <>
To:	David Drysdale <>,,
Subject: Re: [PATCH selftest fails!] m68k: Wire up execveat

[Re-send from a different email address because I apparently can't send 
plaintext from gMail on my phone.]

On 21 Dec 2014 09:37, "Andreas Schwab" <> wrote:
> Geert Uytterhoeven <> writes:
>  > Check success of execveat(5,
> 'xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx...yyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy', 0)... [FAIL] (child 792
> exited with 126 not 127)
> POSIX says
> (
>      If a command is not found, the exit status shall be 127. If the
>      command name is found, but it is not an executable utility, the exit
>      status shall be 126.
 > Andreas.

That sounds like a bit of a grey area -- is ENAMETOOLONG nearer to 
ENOENT or EACCES?   Maybe it's best to make the test allow either (given 
that it's not a test of shell behaviour).

I can update the test to do that, but it probably won't be until the new 
year I'm afraid.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists