[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54992809.7040605@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2014 09:30:01 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
CC: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@...nel.org>, kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
glommer@...il.com
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/2] x86, vdso, pvclock: Cleanups and speedups
On 23/12/2014 09:16, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> Any thoughts as to whether it should be tagged for stable? I haven't
> looked closely enough at the old pvclock code or the generated code to
> have much of an opinion there. It'll be a big speedup for non-pvclock
> users at least.
Yes, please.
Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists