[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141223122458.GF15080@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2014 13:24:58 +0100
From: Dongsu Park <dongsu.park@...fitbricks.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Kent Overstreet <kmo@...erainc.com>,
Ming Lin <mlin@...ggr.net>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 08/17] block: refactor __bio_copy_iov()
On 23.12.2014 02:45, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > static int __bio_copy_iov(struct bio *bio, const struct iov_iter *iter,
> > + int to_iov)
> > {
> > + int i;
> > struct bio_vec *bvec;
> > struct iov_iter iov_iter = *iter;
>
> Why not pass the iov_iter by value?
Agreed.
> > bio_for_each_segment_all(bvec, bio, i) {
> > + ssize_t ret;
> > +
> > + if (to_iov == WRITE)
> > + ret = copy_page_to_iter(bvec->bv_page,
> > + bvec->bv_offset,
> > + bvec->bv_len,
> > + &iov_iter);
> > + else
> > + ret = copy_page_from_iter(bvec->bv_page,
> > + bvec->bv_offset,
> > + bvec->bv_len,
> > + &iov_iter);
> > +
> > + if (!iov_iter_count(&iov_iter))
> > + break;
> >
> > + if (ret < bvec->bv_len)
> > + return -EFAULT;
> > }
> >
> > + return 0;
>
> Seems like this should be split into two functions for the read
> and write cases?
Agreed. I'll update it in the next round.
Thanks,
Dongsu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists