linux-kernel - Re: usb: musb: Scheduling of interrupt endpoints

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 23 Dec 2014 08:59:39 -0600
From:	Carsten Behling <carsten.behling@...gerun.com>
To:	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
CC:	balbi@...com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: usb: musb: Scheduling of interrupt endpoints

Would it help if I send a patch as a suggestion and as basis for discussion?

On 12/19/2014 01:38 PM, Carsten Behling wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Long time ago, TI shipped a kernel named 
> linux-2.6.32.17-psp03.01.01.39 with an additional kernel option
> for scheduling of interrupt endpoints.
>
> AFAIK, this seems to be the only possibility to attach more that 4 in 
> endpoints to MUSB (at least on a DM368).
>
> This feature reserves one hardware endpoint unit to time schedule 
> interrupt in endpoints based
> on its bInterval value triggered by the SOF interrupt.
>
> I didn't find any discussion about adding such a feature to the 
> mainline kernel.
> IMHO, this feature is absolutely necessary. But there may be reasons, 
> not to add it (e.g. CPU load).
>
> Please let me know your thoughts and ideas.
>
> Best regards
> -Carsten
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/