[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141223162357.GA4467@katana>
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2014 17:23:58 +0100
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@...guardiasur.com.ar>
Cc: Walter Lozano <walter@...guardiasur.com.ar>,
mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com, Romain.Baeriswyl@...lis.com,
atull@...nsource.altera.com, raymond.tan@...el.com,
carlpeng008@...il.com, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] i2c: designware: Avoid initcall and initialize the driver
like a regular one
> >> This means there won't be any early users of the I2C platform driver in this
> >> scenario.
> >
> > There won't be with platform as well.
>
> Oh, OK. Then maybe you can clarify why all those i2c busses need to be
> registered with initcall in the first place?
Because they want to access PMICs early to have voltages ready when
other drivers are probed. This, again, is DT/platform independent.
All this is cruft from the pre-deferred-probe era. And pretty annoying
to deprecated although I'd love to do that.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists