| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2014 09:32:07 -0700 From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net> To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net> Subject: [PATCH 7/7] Docs: SubmittingPatches: mention using pull requests as a cover letter Suggested-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net> --- Documentation/SubmittingPatches | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Documentation/SubmittingPatches b/Documentation/SubmittingPatches index 1f4e8c8710a7..40b619ef9b6a 100644 --- a/Documentation/SubmittingPatches +++ b/Documentation/SubmittingPatches @@ -725,7 +725,9 @@ maintainer pull them directly into the subsystem repository with a "git pull" operation. Note, however, that pulling patches from a developer requires a higher degree of trust than taking patches from a mailing list. As a result, many subsystem maintainers are reluctant to take pull -requests, especially from new, unknown developers. +requests, especially from new, unknown developers. If in doubt you can use +the pull request as the cover letter for a normal posting of the patch +series, giving the maintainer the option of using either. A pull request should have [GIT] or [PULL] in the subject line. The request itself should include the repository name and the branch of -- 2.1.0 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists