lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 23 Dec 2014 23:45:22 +0530
From:	punnaiah choudary kalluri <kalluripunnaiahchoudary@...il.com>
To:	Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Cc:	"linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Punnaiah Choudary <kpc528@...il.com>
Subject: nand ecc

Hi,

  I have the following confusions regarding the nand ecc algorithms:
Haming and BCH

Request your help to clarify the below concerns.

Hamming  Mode:
   What will happen if the data has more than two bit errors for codeword?
   Will the nand_correct_data() function returns uncorrectable ecc error ?

BCH mode:
 Assume that the BCH block can correct upto 24bit errors. what will
happen if the data
has more than 24 bit errors?
Will the nand_bch_correct_data() function returns uncorrectable ecc error?


Regards,
Punnaiah
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists