linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND v4] sched/fair: Add advisory flag for borrowing a timeslice

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5499B8A2.4080008@redhat.com>
Date:	Tue, 23 Dec 2014 13:46:58 -0500
From:	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To:	Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@...cle.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CC:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, corbet@....net,
	mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	rientjes@...gle.com, ak@...ux.intel.com, mgorman@...e.de,
	raistlin@...ux.it, kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com,
	atomlin@...hat.com, avagin@...nvz.org, gorcunov@...nvz.org,
	serge.hallyn@...onical.com, athorlton@....com, oleg@...hat.com,
	vdavydov@...allels.com, daeseok.youn@...il.com,
	keescook@...omium.org, yangds.fnst@...fujitsu.com,
	sbauer@....utah.edu, vishnu.ps@...sung.com, axboe@...com,
	paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v4] sched/fair: Add advisory flag for borrowing
 a timeslice

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 12/23/2014 10:13 AM, Khalid Aziz wrote:
> On 12/23/2014 03:52 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> to implement what Thomas suggested in the discussion: a proper 
>> futex like spin mechanism? That looks like a totally acceptable 
>> solution to me, without the disadvantages of your proposed 
>> solution.
> 
> Hi Ingo,
> 
> Thank you for taking the time to respond. It is indeed possible to 
> implement a futex like spin mechanism. Futex like mechanism will
> be clean and elegant. That is where I had started when I was given
> this problem to solve. Trouble I run into is the primary
> application I am looking at to help with this solution is Database
> which implements its own locking mechanism without using POSIX
> semaphore or futex. Since the locking is entirely in userspace,
> kernel has no clue when the userspace has acquired one of these
> locks. So I can see only two ways to solve this - find a solution
> in userspace entirely, or have userspace tell the kernel when it
> acquires one of these locks. I will spend more time on finding a
> way to solve it in userspace and see if I can find a way to 
> leverage futex mechanism without causing significant change to
> database code. There may be a way to use priority inheritance to
> avoid contention. Database performance people tell me that their
> testing has shown the cost of making any system calls in this code
> easily offsets any gains from optimizing for contention avoidance,
> so that is one big challenge. Database rewriting their locking code
> is extremely unlikely scenario. Am I missing a third option here?

An uncontended futex is taken without ever going into kernel
space. Adaptive spinning allows short duration futexes to be
taken without going into kernel space.

Only long held locks cause a thread to go into kernel space,
where it goes to sleep, freeing up the cpu, and increasing
the chance that the lock holder will run.

- -- 
All rights reversed
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUmbihAAoJEM553pKExN6DDlQH/1vvy9YYuP2dCAZSU3fz855e
pj4796Qja929I2dStsbLl6Qhcg2ELtwtPkLoAePQ/4j2l7DCYgSNLXlC+RzQ32ay
rbMIfwiriEVGp2hsvYTOCpnur19IHf7v726ivaDXVOM/nrRaHsB8wwspLQQyfSIE
b7M7jxvT4S2pEELOGB6JQfEZZhbf5wBv9HBk+fkCBMaO4WZrnYczyD0/omiADm65
xSm/8pCMK22u8Tzn9EpKpIVdIFrl9AlZ1uiRBV2Br1oqwaBTvJVknW4bvIk0DWZU
ErwR/073UYKpl+xce3nbnixH8FeRP7/mq73Xd8e+iCgn6Dtzr1tANsu27EigMZ0=
=WHb3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/