linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 06/17] net2280: Remove restart

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 23 Dec 2014 21:20:23 +0100
From:	Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo.ribalda@...il.com>
To:	"balbi@...com" <balbi@...com>
Cc:	Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Peter Chen <peter.chen@...escale.com>,
	Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@...sung.com>,
	Linux USB Mailing List <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/17] net2280: Remove restart_dma inline function definition

Hello Felipe

I was waiting for more comments for the other patches and I forgot to
resend this patch.

I am on holidays and without access to a computer with the right
tools, nevertheless , since the changes are only on the commit message
I have modified the patch with vi.

I have been very careful, but I cannot try to apply it. If it does not
work, please feel free to modify it yourself (if you want) or wait
until I am back


Thanks!!!

On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 7:44 PM, Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 11:16:16PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
>> On 11/28/2014 06:21 PM, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote:
>>
>> >Thanks for reviewing. I will fix it and resend it on the next version
>> >of the patchset to avoid spamming the ML
>>
>> >I guess it is ok to add your Reviewed-by
>>
>>    Yes, if you like.
>>
>> >Thanks!
>>
>>    Not at all. :-)
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> >>On 11/28/2014 04:50 PM, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote:
>>
>> >>>restart_dma is not used before it is declaration. Therefore we can
>>
>> >>    s/it is/its/.
>>
>>    Also s/declaration/definition/.
>>
>> >>>remove this definition.
>>
>> >>    You're removing the declaration, not definition.
>
> do I get a new version of this patch ?
>
> --
> balbi



-- 
Ricardo Ribalda
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/