linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Drivers: bcma: Fix three coding style issues, more than 80 characters per line.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 24 Dec 2014 09:20:59 +0200
From:	Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
To:	Oscar Forner Martinez <oscar.forner.martinez@...il.com>
Cc:	zajec5@...il.com, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Drivers: bcma: Fix three coding style issues, more than 80 characters per line.

Oscar Forner Martinez <oscar.forner.martinez@...il.com> writes:

> Three lines with more than 80 characters per line have been split in several lines.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oscar Forner Martinez <oscar.forner.martinez@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/bcma/driver_chipcommon.c | 10 +++++++---
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Just to handle the bureaucracy before v2 is submitted:

To which tree should this go to? I see that earlier John has applied
patches to drivers/bcma/, but what about now? Should I take these? John,
any suggestions?

Oscar, the patchwork entry for this patch looked odd. I'm guessing it
was because your time (or timezone) is wrong:

https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/5535751/

-- 
Kalle Valo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/