[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4f5efe169ed3ab16ffcbee52dd6b7661@agner.ch>
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2014 17:00:05 +0100
From: Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>
To: Sanchayan Maity <maitysanchayan@...il.com>
Cc: Peter.Chen@...escale.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] usb: chipidea: Add identification registers access
APIs
On 2014-12-19 10:55, Sanchayan Maity wrote:
> Using hw_write_id_reg and hw_read_id_reg to write and read
> identification registers contents. This can be used to get
> controller information, change some system configurations
> and so on.
Checkpatch is complaining about DOS line endings and some trailing
whitespace. This applies to all three patches.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sanchayan Maity <maitysanchayan@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/usb/chipidea/ci.h | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci.h b/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci.h
> index ea40626..94db636 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci.h
> +++ b/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci.h
> @@ -29,6 +29,15 @@
> /******************************************************************************
> * REGISTERS
> *****************************************************************************/
> +/* Identification Registers */
> +#define ID_ID 0x0
> +#define ID_HWGENERAL 0x4
> +#define ID_HWHOST 0x8
> +#define ID_HWDEVICE 0xc
> +#define ID_HWTXBUF 0x10
> +#define ID_HWRXBUF 0x14
> +#define ID_SBUSCFG 0x90
> +
> /* register indices */
> enum ci_hw_regs {
> CAP_CAPLENGTH,
> @@ -97,6 +106,18 @@ enum ci_role {
> CI_ROLE_END,
> };
>
> +enum CI_REVISION {
Usually the enum names are small caps, only the labels are capitalized.
I would suggest use ci_revision here (similar to the enum above).
> + CI_REVISION_1X = 10, /* Revision 1.x */
> + CI_REVISION_20 = 20, /* Revision 2.0 */
> + CI_REVISION_21, /* Revision 2.1 */
> + CI_REVISION_22, /* Revision 2.2 */
> + CI_REVISION_23, /* Revision 2.3 */
> + CI_REVISION_24, /* Revision 2.4 */
> + CI_REVISION_25, /* Revision 2.5 */
> + CI_REVISION_25_PLUS, /* Revision above than 2.5 */
> + CI_REVISION_UNKNOWN = 99, /* Unknown Revision */
> +};
> +
> /**
> * struct ci_role_driver - host/gadget role driver
> * @start: start this role
> @@ -168,6 +189,7 @@ struct hw_bank {
> * @b_sess_valid_event: indicates there is a vbus event, and handled
> * at ci_otg_work
> * @imx28_write_fix: Freescale imx28 needs swp instruction for writing
> + * @rev: The revision number for controller
> */
> struct ci_hdrc {
> struct device *dev;
> @@ -207,6 +229,7 @@ struct ci_hdrc {
> bool id_event;
> bool b_sess_valid_event;
> bool imx28_write_fix;
> + enum CI_REVISION rev;
> };
>
> static inline struct ci_role_driver *ci_role(struct ci_hdrc *ci)
> @@ -244,6 +267,36 @@ static inline void ci_role_stop(struct ci_hdrc *ci)
> }
>
> /**
> + * hw_read_id_reg: reads from a identification register
> + * @ci: the controller
> + * @offset: offset from the beginning of identification registers region
> + * @mask: bitfield mask
> + *
> + * This function returns register contents
> + */
> +static inline u32 hw_read_id_reg(struct ci_hdrc *ci, u32 offset, u32 mask)
> +{
> + return ioread32(ci->hw_bank.abs + offset) & mask;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * hw_write_id_reg: writes to a identification register
> + * @ci: the controller
> + * @offset: offset from the beginning of identification registers region
> + * @mask: bitfield mask
> + * @data: new value
> + */
> +static inline void hw_write_id_reg(struct ci_hdrc *ci, u32 offset,
> + u32 mask, u32 data)
> +{
> + if (~mask)
> + data = (ioread32(ci->hw_bank.abs + offset) & ~mask)
> + | (data & mask);
> +
> + iowrite32(data, ci->hw_bank.abs + offset);
> +}
This function isn't used anywhere, does it make sense to write an ID
register? The ones I see in Vybrid's RM are read-only anyway..
--
Stefan
> +
> +/**
> * hw_read: reads from a hw register
> * @ci: the controller
> * @reg: register index
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists