[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141225201620.GC22951@htj.dyndns.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2014 15:16:20 -0500
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>,
"Gu, Zheng" <guz.fnst@...fujitsu.com>,
tangchen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>,
Hiroyuki KAMEZAWA <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] workqueue: update wq_numa_possible_cpumask
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 10:02:04AM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> 1) "NUMA code" = system's NUMA memory hotplug code, AKA, keep the numa mapping stable
>
> I think this is the better idea. This idea came to my mind immediately at the time
> I received the bug report. And after some discussions, I was told that it is too HARD
> to keep the numa mapping stable across multiple physical system-board/node online/offline.
If the arch needs to change it, that's fine, I guess. What I'm saying
is that we should move this table building and maintenance to numa
code proper. It was already a bit icky to build it inside workqueue.
Trying to manage it dynamically manage it from there is too ugly.
Let's please make this mapping table a proper part of NUMA
infrastructure with proper notification callbacks.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists