lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 26 Dec 2014 12:33:36 +1100
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc:	Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: question about the luto-misc tree

Hi Andy,

On Mon, 22 Dec 2014 11:16:56 -0800 Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> wrote:
>
> I'm re-adding the branch, since 3.19-rc1 is out, the change appears to
> still exist as-is in your tree, and it merges cleanly and builds in
> the latest -next for me.  Let me know if this will be problematic for
> any reason.

So, now we have a problem because Paul has rebased a whole set of
commits that you have in your tree.  Commits c6dc129cf2d1 to
f58d100f65ae in your tree Paul has rebased on top of v3.19-rc1.  If you
are going to base your tree on (part of) Paul's tree, then Paul has to
agree to not rebase that part of his tree or you have to keep a watch
on his tree and rebase you tree on top of those rebased commits.
Really, the first should happen.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists