lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141226153822.20a6bcfe@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Fri, 26 Dec 2014 15:38:22 +1100
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com>
Cc:	linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: add the omap-pending tree

Hi Paul,

On Fri, 19 Dec 2014 19:28:08 +0000 (UTC) Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com> wrote:
>
> Might you be willing to include this branch in your linux-next builds?
> 
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pjw/omap-pending.git#for-next
> 
> It will include OMAP clock, bus architecture, and low-level power 
> management patches that are planned to be included in pull requests to the 
> OMAP upstream maintainer, Tony Lindgren.  He in turn will submit pull 
> requests to the arm-soc tree.  The objective in including this branch is 
> to get these patches integration-tested earlier than they would be 
> otherwise.

Added from today (called "omap" and with you as the contact).

Thanks for adding your subsystem tree as a participant of linux-next.  As
you may know, this is not a judgment of your code.  The purpose of
linux-next is for integration testing and to lower the impact of
conflicts between subsystems in the next merge window. 

You will need to ensure that the patches/commits in your tree/series have
been:
     * submitted under GPL v2 (or later) and include the Contributor's
        Signed-off-by,
     * posted to the relevant mailing list,
     * reviewed by you (or another maintainer of your subsystem tree),
     * successfully unit tested, and 
     * destined for the current or next Linux merge window.

Basically, this should be just what you would send to Linus (or ask him
to fetch).  It is allowed to be rebased if you deem it necessary.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell 
sfr@...b.auug.org.au

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ