[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141227003636.GA32271@codemonkey.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2014 19:36:36 -0500
From: Dave Jones <davej@...emonkey.org.uk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Chris Mason <clm@...com>,
Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Dâniel Fraga <fragabr@...il.com>,
Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Suresh Siddha <sbsiddha@...il.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Peter Anvin <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: frequent lockups in 3.18rc4
On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 03:16:41PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Dave Jones <davej@...emonkey.org.uk> wrote:
> >
> > hm.
>
> So with the previous patch that had the false positives, you never saw
> this? You saw the false positives instead?
correct.
> I'm wondering if the added debug noise just ended up helping. Doing a
> printk() will automatically cause some scheduler activity. And they
> also caused the time reading jiggle.
>
> That said, it's also possible that I screwed something up in the
> second version of the patch, just breaking it and making it generally
> ineffective.
>
> Oh - and have you actually seen the "TSC unstable (delta = xyz)" +
> "switched to hpet" messages there yet?
not yet. 3 hrs in.
Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists