[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1419710121.6140.0.camel@egrumbacBox>
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2014 19:55:21 +0000
From: "Grumbach, Emmanuel" <emmanuel.grumbach@...el.com>
To: "Julia.Lawall@...6.fr" <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>
CC: "linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
"kvalo@...eaurora.org" <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"ilw@...ux.intel.com" <ilw@...ux.intel.com>,
"Berg, Johannes" <johannes.berg@...el.com>,
"kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org" <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/27] iwlwifi: dvm: main: Use setup_timer
On Fri, 2014-12-26 at 15:35 +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> Convert a call to init_timer and accompanying intializations of
> the timer's data and function fields to a call to setup_timer.
>
> A simplified version of the semantic match that fixes this problem is as
> follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
>
> // <smpl>
> @@
> expression t,f,d;
> @@
>
> -init_timer(&t);
> +setup_timer(&t,f,d);
> -t.data = d;
> -t.function = f;
> // </smpl>
>
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>
>
Both applied - thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists