linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 07/17] block: replace sg_iovec with iov

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 27 Dec 2014 07:03:25 -0800
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	Dongsu Park <dongsu.park@...fitbricks.com>
Cc:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
	Kent Overstreet <kmo@...erainc.com>,
	Ming Lin <mlin@...ggr.net>,
	Doug Gilbert <dgilbert@...erlog.com>,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <JBottomley@...allels.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 07/17] block: replace sg_iovec with iov_iter

On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 01:18:15PM +0100, Dongsu Park wrote:
> I think so too. Patches #07-10 can be split into a separate patchset.
> I guess they are included just because Kent tried to follow up
> suggestions in the previous discussion.
> I don't care about either way. So I'll split them up.

In case I wasn't quite clear:  I'd prefer you to send the patches that
just clean existing code and API use first, and then the bio splitting
series on top of that.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/