| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2014 09:38:55 +0100 From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com> To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> CC: linux-next <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: linux-next: missing merge fix for the access_once tree Am 23.12.2014 um 07:34 schrieb Stephen Rothwell: > Hi Linus, > > On Mon, 22 Dec 2014 20:12:22 -0800 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote: >> >> On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 6:17 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote: >>> >>> I have been carrying this merge fix patch for some time. It should >>> have gone into the merge of the access_once tree. >> >> No, you had a different tree that got merged into linux-next, that >> made it an error to do ACCESS_ONCE() on a structure. >> >> The thing I merged didn't actually have that final commit, exactly so >> that things wouldn't break from missing conversions. >> >> So that patch isn't wrong, but it also isn't exactly a required fix >> until the next merge window.. > > True, so "should" was a bit strong. > I will re-add this up soon for my linux-next branch. There are some additional places which need to be changed, so give me some more days during the holidays Christian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists