lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1419836251.4862.4.camel@intel.com>
Date:	Mon, 29 Dec 2014 14:57:31 +0800
From:	Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
To:	Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@...hat.com>
Cc:	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, lkp@...org
Subject: [LKP] [xfs] dbe1b5ca263: +6.5% will-it-scale.per_thread_ops

FYI, we noticed the below changes on

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master
commit dbe1b5ca26396b6c61d711c8ac4de13ebb02e9f6 ("xfs: Make xfs_vn_rename compliant with renameat2() syscall")


testbox/testcase/testparams: lkp-nex05/will-it-scale/performance-pwrite1

       v3.19-rc1  dbe1b5ca26396b6c61d711c8ac  
----------------  --------------------------  
         %stddev     %change         %stddev
             \          |                \  
   1131870 ±  0%      +6.5%    1205531 ±  0%  will-it-scale.per_thread_ops
   1209729 ±  0%      +5.8%    1280184 ±  0%  will-it-scale.per_process_ops
      0.54 ±  0%      -3.1%       0.53 ±  1%  will-it-scale.scalability
      1400 ± 30%    +174.5%       3842 ± 34%  sched_debug.cpu#36.nr_switches
       810 ± 33%    +154.2%       2060 ± 25%  sched_debug.cpu#36.ttwu_count
       163 ± 41%     +96.6%        320 ± 42%  sched_debug.cpu#2.ttwu_local
       242 ± 38%     +71.4%        416 ± 19%  slabinfo.blkdev_queue.active_objs
       137 ± 28%     +99.3%        274 ± 22%  sched_debug.cpu#26.ttwu_local
        29 ± 44%    +116.0%         63 ± 28%  sched_debug.cfs_rq[50]:/.tg_load_contrib
      1296 ± 34%     +41.5%       1835 ± 19%  sched_debug.cpu#63.ttwu_local
       405 ± 30%     -42.3%        234 ± 15%  sched_debug.cpu#56.sched_goidle
       314 ± 27%     +43.6%        452 ± 11%  slabinfo.blkdev_queue.num_objs
       980 ± 28%     -37.7%        611 ± 13%  sched_debug.cpu#56.nr_switches
       684 ± 25%     +40.5%        962 ± 20%  sched_debug.cpu#10.ttwu_count
      1.03 ±  2%     -38.8%       0.63 ±  7%  perf-profile.cpu-cycles.current_kernel_time.file_update_time.__generic_file_write_iter.generic_file_write_iter.new_sync_write
       838 ± 25%     -33.1%        560 ± 14%  sched_debug.cpu#60.nr_switches
      4870 ± 19%     +25.8%       6127 ± 14%  sched_debug.cpu#63.nr_switches
      1443 ± 10%     +39.9%       2019 ± 23%  sched_debug.cpu#2.sched_count
        39 ± 20%     +55.1%         61 ± 16%  latency_stats.max.call_rwsem_down_write_failed.SyS_mprotect.system_call_fastpath
       336 ± 33%     -37.8%        209 ± 12%  sched_debug.cpu#60.sched_goidle
      2.27 ± 12%     -33.6%       1.51 ±  2%  perf-profile.cpu-cycles.rw_verify_area.vfs_write.sys_pwrite64.system_call_fastpath.__libc_pwrite
       394 ± 19%     -31.5%        270 ± 13%  sched_debug.cpu#52.sched_goidle
       986 ± 19%     -25.0%        740 ± 11%  sched_debug.cpu#52.nr_switches
      2.25 ±  4%     -28.4%       1.61 ±  6%  perf-profile.cpu-cycles.security_file_permission.rw_verify_area.vfs_write.sys_pwrite64.system_call_fastpath
       257 ± 15%     +52.9%        394 ± 28%  sched_debug.cpu#10.ttwu_local
      1.24 ± 10%     -26.7%       0.91 ±  8%  perf-profile.cpu-cycles.selinux_file_permission.security_file_permission.rw_verify_area.vfs_write.sys_pwrite64
      1.12 ±  6%     -27.7%       0.81 ±  8%  perf-profile.cpu-cycles.rw_verify_area.vfs_write.sys_pwrite64.system_call_fastpath.__libc_pwrite64
      3385 ± 10%      +8.9%       3687 ±  8%  sched_debug.cpu#39.curr->pid
      4.01 ±  0%     +27.4%       5.11 ±  1%  perf-profile.cpu-cycles.file_update_time.__generic_file_write_iter.generic_file_write_iter.new_sync_write.vfs_write
      1.05 ±  2%     -23.8%       0.80 ±  5%  perf-profile.cpu-cycles.iov_iter_fault_in_readable.__generic_file_write_iter.generic_file_write_iter.new_sync_write.vfs_write
      0.83 ±  3%     +24.7%       1.03 ±  1%  perf-profile.cpu-cycles.current_fs_time.file_update_time.__generic_file_write_iter.generic_file_write_iter.new_sync_write
      0.88 ±  2%     +15.2%       1.02 ±  2%  perf-profile.cpu-cycles.__sb_end_write.vfs_write.sys_pwrite64.system_call_fastpath.__libc_pwrite64
      0.99 ±  1%     +14.5%       1.14 ±  1%  perf-profile.cpu-cycles.system_call.__libc_pwrite
      2.60 ±  2%     +11.7%       2.91 ±  0%  perf-profile.cpu-cycles.__srcu_read_lock.fsnotify.vfs_write.sys_pwrite64.system_call_fastpath
      3.56 ±  6%     +12.4%       4.00 ±  4%  perf-profile.cpu-cycles.unlock_page.shmem_write_end.generic_perform_write.__generic_file_write_iter.generic_file_write_iter
       252 ±  0%      +7.8%        272 ±  1%  time.user_time

lkp-nex05: Nehalem-EX
Memory: 192G




                             will-it-scale.per_process_ops

   1.4e+06 ++--O--------------O---------------------------------------------+
  1.38e+06 O+         O   O                                                 |
           |                      O                                         |
  1.36e+06 ++      O                                                        |
  1.34e+06 ++                                                               |
           |                                                                |
  1.32e+06 ++                         O                                     |
   1.3e+06 ++                                O   O       O                  |
  1.28e+06 ++                             O          O       O      O   O   |
           |                                                     O          O
  1.26e+06 ++                                                               |
  1.24e+06 ++                                                               |
           |                                                                |
  1.22e+06 ++        .*...*...*...*...*...*..*                              |
   1.2e+06 *+--*---*--------------------------------------------------------+


                             will-it-scale.per_thread_ops

  1.32e+06 ++---------------------------------------------------------------+
   1.3e+06 ++  O      O   O                                                 |
           O       O          O                                             |
  1.28e+06 ++                     O                                         |
  1.26e+06 ++                                                               |
           |                                                                |
  1.24e+06 ++                                                               |
  1.22e+06 ++                         O          O       O                  |
   1.2e+06 ++                             O  O       O       O   O  O   O   O
           |                                                                |
  1.18e+06 ++                                                               |
  1.16e+06 ++                                                               |
           |                        ..*...                                  |
  1.14e+06 *+..      .*...*...*...*.      *..*                              |
  1.12e+06 ++--*---*--------------------------------------------------------+


	[*] bisect-good sample
	[O] bisect-bad  sample

To reproduce:

	apt-get install ruby ruby-oj
	git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git
	cd lkp-tests
	bin/setup-local job.yaml # the job file attached in this email
	bin/run-local   job.yaml


Disclaimer:
Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided
for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software
design or configuration may affect actual performance.


Thanks,
Huang, Ying



View attachment "job.yaml" of type "text/plain" (1491 bytes)

View attachment "reproduce" of type "text/plain" (4767 bytes)

_______________________________________________
LKP mailing list
LKP@...ux.intel.com

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ