linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.2 24/27] ipv4: dst_entry leak in ip_send_unicast

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <lsq.1419815491.800439287@decadent.org.uk>
Date:	Mon, 29 Dec 2014 02:11:31 +0100
From:	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"Vasily Averin" <vvs@...allels.com>,
	"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.2 24/27] ipv4: dst_entry leak in ip_send_unicast_reply()

3.2.66-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Vasily Averin <vvs@...allels.com>

commit 4062090e3e5caaf55bed4523a69f26c3265cc1d2 upstream.

ip_setup_cork() called inside ip_append_data() steals dst entry from rt to cork
and in case errors in __ip_append_data() nobody frees stolen dst entry

Fixes: 2e77d89b2fa8 ("net: avoid a pair of dst_hold()/dst_release() in ip_append_data()")
Signed-off-by: Vasily Averin <vvs@...allels.com>
Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
[bwh: Backported to 3.2: adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
 net/ipv4/ip_output.c | 12 +++++++++---
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/net/ipv4/ip_output.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/ip_output.c
@@ -1472,6 +1472,7 @@ void ip_send_reply(struct sock *sk, stru
 	struct ipcm_cookie ipc;
 	struct flowi4 fl4;
 	struct rtable *rt = skb_rtable(skb);
+	int err;
 
 	if (ip_options_echo(&replyopts.opt.opt, skb))
 		return;
@@ -1509,8 +1510,13 @@ void ip_send_reply(struct sock *sk, stru
 	sk->sk_priority = skb->priority;
 	sk->sk_protocol = ip_hdr(skb)->protocol;
 	sk->sk_bound_dev_if = arg->bound_dev_if;
-	ip_append_data(sk, &fl4, ip_reply_glue_bits, arg->iov->iov_base, len, 0,
-		       &ipc, &rt, MSG_DONTWAIT);
+	err = ip_append_data(sk, &fl4, ip_reply_glue_bits, arg->iov->iov_base,
+			     len, 0, &ipc, &rt, MSG_DONTWAIT);
+	if (unlikely(err)) {
+		ip_flush_pending_frames(sk);
+		goto out;
+	}
+
 	if ((skb = skb_peek(&sk->sk_write_queue)) != NULL) {
 		if (arg->csumoffset >= 0)
 			*((__sum16 *)skb_transport_header(skb) +
@@ -1519,7 +1525,7 @@ void ip_send_reply(struct sock *sk, stru
 		skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_NONE;
 		ip_push_pending_frames(sk, &fl4);
 	}
-
+out:
 	bh_unlock_sock(sk);
 
 	ip_rt_put(rt);

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/