[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1419822060.18886.1.camel@perches.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2014 19:01:00 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: overlayfs: Fix coding style issues, missing a blank
line after declarations
On Mon, 2014-12-29 at 02:49 +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 02:39:39AM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 11:56:53AM +0600, Alexander Kuleshov wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Kuleshov <kuleshovmail@...il.com>
> > > ---
> >
> > For the record: anything of that sort against fs/*.c will be flushed down
> > the toilet where such valuable contributions belong. Don't even bother.
>
> Joe, could you please explain what has driven you to include that into
> scripts/checkpatch.pl and open the countless sphincters? Aren't we
> getting enough pointless patches as it is?
I don't care for that style actually.
It was Andrew Morton that wanted it used globally.
I wanted it to be a --strict test and only for
net/ and drivers/net/ where David Miller prefers
that style.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/6/550
> Al, stongly tempted to try and sneak a patch to checkpatch.pl declaring the
> lack of /* See Figure 1 */ within the first 10 lines of a function an offense
> against the Gods Of Style. Then sit back and watch the resulting spew...
Cool. Awaiting your patch...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists