lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2014 05:02:30 -0800 From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com> Cc: linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: [ANNOUNCE] scsi patch queue tree updated It turnd out while the scsi-queue tree in general worked very well the split into core and drivers branches was rather cumbersome. For the 3.19 merge window updates and the 3.20 window I've switched to a single branch instead: git://git.infradead.org/users/hch/scsi-queue.git scsi-for-3.19 git://git.infradead.org/users/hch/scsi-queue.git scsi-for-3.20 So far there 3.20 tree is still rather small, but there are a couple of series that need a resend or review and should go in. The rules from the original scsi-queue tree have worked well, so they still apply with a minor change. These rules are: - the patch needs at least two positive reviews (non-author signoff, reviewed-by or acked-by tags). In practice this means it had at least one and I added another one. As an exception I also take trivial and important fixes if they only have a Tested-by: instead of a second review. - the patch has no negative review on the mailing list - the patch applies cleanly - the patch compiles (drivers for architectures I can't test excluded) - for core the core branch: the patch survives a full xfstests run -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists