linux-kernel - [ANNOUNCE] scsi patch queue tree updated

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 30 Dec 2014 05:02:30 -0800
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
Cc:	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] scsi patch queue tree updated

It turnd out while the scsi-queue tree in general worked very well
the split into core and drivers branches was rather cumbersome.

For the 3.19 merge window updates and the 3.20 window I've switched
to a single branch instead:

   git://git.infradead.org/users/hch/scsi-queue.git scsi-for-3.19
   git://git.infradead.org/users/hch/scsi-queue.git scsi-for-3.20

So far there 3.20 tree is still rather small, but there are a couple
of series that need a resend or review and should go in.

The rules from the original scsi-queue tree have worked well, so they
still apply with a minor change.  These rules are:

 - the patch needs at least two positive reviews (non-author signoff,
   reviewed-by or acked-by tags).   In practice this means it had at
   least one and I added another one.
   As an exception I also take trivial and important fixes if they
   only have a Tested-by: instead of a second review.
 - the patch has no negative review on the mailing list
 - the patch applies cleanly
 - the patch compiles (drivers for architectures I can't test excluded)
 - for core the core branch: the patch survives a full xfstests run
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/