lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2014 22:02:56 -0600 From: Dave Kleikamp <dave.kleikamp@...cle.com> To: tytso@....edu, nick <xerofoify@...il.com>, jfs-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: Remove TO DO in jfs_xtree.c On 12/29/2014 09:48 PM, tytso@....edu wrote: > On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 04:13:37PM -0600, Dave Kleikamp wrote: >> On 12/27/2014 06:58 PM, nick wrote: >>> Greetings Dave, >>> I am wondering why there is a TO DO above this code: >>> * ToDo: tlocks should be on doubly-linked list, so we can >>> * quickly remove it and add it to the end. >> >> I'm sure the idea was to avoid the for loop needed to find the previous >> entry in the linked list. A doubly-linked list makes it much simpler to >> remove an item from an arbitrary position in the list. > > Hi Dave, > > Just in case you weren't aware, Nick has been banned from the LKML > list for being a troll. Thanks, Ted. Now I remember some earlier threads. Forgot it was the same person. Just figured him for a novice looking for something to contribute. Thanks, Shaggy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists