linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] Drivers: scsi: storvsc: Fix miscellaneous issues

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20141230093210.GA6294@infradead.org>
Date:	Tue, 30 Dec 2014 01:32:10 -0800
From:	"hch@...radead.org" <hch@...radead.org>
To:	KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>
Cc:	"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devel@...uxdriverproject.org" <devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
	"ohering@...e.com" <ohering@...e.com>,
	"jbottomley@...allels.com" <jbottomley@...allels.com>,
	"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Drivers: scsi: storvsc: Fix miscellaneous issues

On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 09:07:59PM +0000, KY Srinivasan wrote:
> Should I be resending these patches.

I don't need a resend, I need a review for the patches.  Note that for
driver patches I'm also fine with a review from a co worker, as long as
it's a real review not just a rubber stamp.

Talking about process:  for the next submission please only use
"storvsc:  " as the subject prefix, I had to remove "Drivers: scsi: "
which doesn'd add useful information every time so far.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/