lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2014 01:32:10 -0800 From: "hch@...radead.org" <hch@...radead.org> To: KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com> Cc: "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "devel@...uxdriverproject.org" <devel@...uxdriverproject.org>, "ohering@...e.com" <ohering@...e.com>, "jbottomley@...allels.com" <jbottomley@...allels.com>, "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Drivers: scsi: storvsc: Fix miscellaneous issues On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 09:07:59PM +0000, KY Srinivasan wrote: > Should I be resending these patches. I don't need a resend, I need a review for the patches. Note that for driver patches I'm also fine with a review from a co worker, as long as it's a real review not just a rubber stamp. Talking about process: for the next submission please only use "storvsc: " as the subject prefix, I had to remove "Drivers: scsi: " which doesn'd add useful information every time so far. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists