linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drm: Move two seq_printf's outside of locked mutex

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <54A3B9F7.4080808@gannon.se>
Date:	Wed, 31 Dec 2014 09:55:19 +0100
From:	Jonas Lundqvist <jonas@...non.se>
To:	Jeremiah Mahler <jmmahler@...il.com>, airlied@...ux.ie,
	dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: Move two seq_printf's outside of locked mutex

Hi Jeremiah,

On 12/30/2014 11:52 PM, Jeremiah Mahler wrote:
> You changed 'i' but you didn't explain in your log message why you did this.

I can change the commit message to something more generic. "Move code
outside of locked mutex" or similar.

> Does this change really improve anything?  It may work the same with the
> locks moved around.  But if you look at the function as a whole, the
> locks encapsulate the body of this function nicely.  I like the original
> design better.

The locking was already done this way, ie after the seq_printf, in the
functions drm_clients_info() and drm_gem_name_info() in thr same file.
So this change is really more of an alignment.

Best regards
Jonas


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)