[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54A3C837.6040400@broadcom.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2014 10:56:07 +0100
From: Arend van Spriel <arend@...adcom.com>
To: "Fu, Zhonghui" <zhonghui.fu@...ux.intel.com>
CC: <brudley@...adcom.com>, Franky Lin <frankyl@...adcom.com>,
<meuleman@...adcom.com>, <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
<linville@...driver.com>, <pieterpg@...adcom.com>,
<hdegoede@...hat.com>, <wens@...e.org>,
<linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
<brcm80211-dev-list@...adcom.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] brcmfmac: avoid duplicated suspend/resume operation
On 12/31/14 09:20, Fu, Zhonghui wrote:
> From e34419970a07bfcd365f9c66bdfa552188a0cd26 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Zhonghui Fu<zhonghui.fu@...ux.intel.com>
> Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2014 21:25:31 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] brcmfmac: avoid duplicated suspend/resume operation
>
> WiFi chip has 2 SDIO functions, and PM core will trigger
> twice suspend/resume operations for one WiFi chip to do
> the same things. This patch avoid this case.
We have a patch queued up for this as well, but this one looks good
enough although I personally prefer container_of() instead of
dev_to_sdio_func().
Acked-by: Arend van Spriel <arend@...adcom.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zhonghui Fu<zhonghui.fu@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++--
> 1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c
> index 3c06e93..eee7818 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c
> @@ -1139,11 +1139,18 @@ void brcmf_sdio_wowl_config(struct device *dev, bool enabled)
> static int brcmf_ops_sdio_suspend(struct device *dev)
> {
> struct brcmf_bus *bus_if = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> - struct brcmf_sdio_dev *sdiodev = bus_if->bus_priv.sdio;
> + struct brcmf_sdio_dev *sdiodev;
> mmc_pm_flag_t sdio_flags;
> + struct sdio_func *func = dev_to_sdio_func(dev);
>
> brcmf_dbg(SDIO, "Enter\n");
>
> + if (func->num == 2) {
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + sdiodev = bus_if->bus_priv.sdio;
> +
> atomic_set(&sdiodev->suspend, true);
>
> if (sdiodev->wowl_enabled) {
> @@ -1164,9 +1171,17 @@ static int brcmf_ops_sdio_suspend(struct device *dev)
> static int brcmf_ops_sdio_resume(struct device *dev)
> {
> struct brcmf_bus *bus_if = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> - struct brcmf_sdio_dev *sdiodev = bus_if->bus_priv.sdio;
> + struct brcmf_sdio_dev *sdiodev;
> + struct sdio_func *func = dev_to_sdio_func(dev);
>
> brcmf_dbg(SDIO, "Enter\n");
> +
> + if (func->num == 2) {
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + sdiodev = bus_if->bus_priv.sdio;
> +
> if (sdiodev->pdata->oob_irq_supported)
> disable_irq_wake(sdiodev->pdata->oob_irq_nr);
> brcmf_sdio_wd_timer(sdiodev->bus, BRCMF_WD_POLL_MS);
> -- 1.7.1
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists