linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] Input: touchscreen-iproc: Add Broadcom iProc touchscreen driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <54A49B01.6020002@broadcom.com>
Date:	Wed, 31 Dec 2014 16:55:29 -0800
From:	Jonathan Richardson <jonathar@...adcom.com>
To:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
CC:	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
	<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] Input: touchscreen-iproc: Add Broadcom iProc touchscreen
 driver

Hi,

Would anyone be able to look at this to help us move forward? Thanks.

On 14-12-19 03:03 PM, Jonathan Richardson wrote:
> On 14-12-19 02:26 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
>> On Fri, 2014-12-19 at 14:17 -0800, Jonathan Richardson wrote:
>>> Add initial version of the Broadcom touchscreen driver.
>>
>> more trivia:
>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/bcm_iproc_tsc.c b/drivers/input/touchscreen/bcm_iproc_tsc.c
>> []
>>> +static int get_tsc_config(struct device_node *np, struct iproc_ts_priv *priv)
>>> +{
>>> +	u32 val;
>> []
>>> +	if (of_property_read_u32(np, "debounce_timeout", &val) >= 0) {
>>> +		if (val < 0 || val > 255) {
>>> +			dev_err(dev, "debounce_timeout must be [0-255]\n");
>>> +			return -EINVAL;
>>> +		}
>>> +		priv->cfg_params.debounce_timeout = val;
>>
>> Doesn't the compiler generate a warning message
>> about an impossible "unsigned < 0" test for all
>> of these "val < 0" uses?
>>
> 
> Actually no it doesn't. The gcc output shows that neither -Wtype-limits
> nor -Wextra are used to compile that file. I assume this is because
> there would be just too many warnings.
> 
> 
>>> +	}
>>> +
>>> +	if (of_property_read_u32(np, "settling_timeout", &val) >= 0) {
>>> +		if (val < 0 || val > 11) {
>> []
>>> +	if (of_property_read_u32(np, "touch_timeout", &val) >= 0) {
>>> +		if (val < 0 || val > 255) {
>> []
>>> +	if (of_property_read_u32(np, "average_data", &val) >= 0) {
>>> +		if (val < 0 || val > 8) {
>> []
>>> +	if (of_property_read_u32(np, "fifo_threshold", &val) >= 0) {
>>> +		if (val < 0 || val > 31) {
>>
>>
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/