lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 02 Jan 2015 10:29:43 +0100
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:	Rickard Strandqvist <rickard_strandqvist@...ctrumdigital.se>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch: arm: mach-rpc: ecard:  Remove some unused functions

On Thursday 01 January 2015 18:55:12 Rickard Strandqvist wrote:
> Removes some functions that are not used anywhere:
> ecard_disablefiq() ecard_enablefiq()
> 
> This was partially found by using a static code analysis program called cppcheck.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rickard Strandqvist <rickard_strandqvist@...ctrumdigital.se>

Looks like a correct change to me, very nice!

However looking a bit further you will notice that after this is removed,
there is more that becomes unused:

> -void ecard_enablefiq(unsigned int fiqnr)
> -{
> -	ecard_t *ec = slot_to_ecard(fiqnr);
> -
> -	if (ec) {
> -		if (!ec->ops)
> -			ec->ops = &ecard_default_ops;
> -
> -		if (ec->claimed && ec->ops->fiqenable)
> -			ec->ops->fiqenable(ec, fiqnr);
> -		else
> -			printk(KERN_ERR "ecard: rejecting request to "
> -				"enable FIQs for %d\n", fiqnr);
> -	}
> -}
> -
> -void ecard_disablefiq(unsigned int fiqnr)
> -{
> -	ecard_t *ec = slot_to_ecard(fiqnr);
> -
> -	if (ec) {
> -		if (!ec->ops)
> -			ec->ops = &ecard_default_ops;
> -
> -		if (ec->ops->fiqdisable)
> -			ec->ops->fiqdisable(ec, fiqnr);
> -	}
> -}

These are in fact the only references to the fiqenable/fiqdisable/fiqpending
callback pointers, so it would be helpful to remove them as well, along with
the stub implementation from 

Is cppcheck something you are working on yourself, or did you pick it up
from someone else? Is it possible to get cppcheck to also find those unused
callback pointers? I assume we have more of them in other code.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ