[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150103012128.GA11373@saruman>
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2015 19:21:28 -0600
From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC: Sneeker Yeh <sneeker.yeh@...il.com>, Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...el.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Thomas Pugliese <thomas.pugliese@...il.com>,
David Mosberger <davidm@...uge.net>,
Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@...aro.org>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@...omium.org>,
Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
Andy Green <andy.green@...aro.org>,
Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@...aro.org>,
Sneeker Yeh <Sneeker.Yeh@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] usb: dwc3: add Fujitsu Specific Glue layer
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 11:12:51AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 29 December 2014 01:52:04 Sneeker Yeh wrote:
> > > > +static int dwc3_mb86s70_remove_child(struct device *dev, void *unused)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
> > > > +
> > > > + of_device_unregister(pdev);
> > > > +
> > > > + return 0;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static u64 dwc3_mb86s70_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32);
> > >
> > > why ? Use dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent().
> > >
> >
> > okay.
>
> Actually that is still wrong: we use dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent() to
> annotate drivers that have traditionally been forcing their own dma mask
> by some other means and that need to be changed to something proper (after
> finding out why they did it in the first place).
>
> Since this is about a child device, the correct interface is to use
> platform_device_register_full().
no, that's wrong. He's essentially fixing the default set by OF core,
which is always 32-bits anyway, so this can actually be removed. Your
suggestion would just make it worse.
--
balbi
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists