[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54A9563F.3070902@oracle.com>
Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2015 10:03:27 -0500
From: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
"open list:VIRTIO CORE, NET..."
<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] virtio: don't free memory until the underlying struct
device has been released
On 01/04/2015 06:26 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 02, 2015 at 02:47:40PM -0500, Sasha Levin wrote:
>> > When releasing a virtio device, We can't free a struct virtio_device until the
>> > underlying struct device has been released, which might not happen immediately
>> > on device_unregister() even if that was the device's last reference.
>> >
>> > Instead, free the memory only once we know the device is gone in the release
>> > callback.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
>
> Isn't this an old bug: do we need to copy stable on a fix?
>
> What is the behaviour without this patch?
> Is there a way to make this cause a crash?
It will oops if CONFIG_DEBUG_KOBJECT_RELEASE is enabled. I guess
it needs to go to stable as well.
Thanks,
Sasha
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists