[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1420386340-7719-4-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2015 18:02:27 +0200
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: sasha.levin@...cle.com, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] virtio_pci: document why we defer kfree
The reason we defer kfree until release function is because it's a
general rule for kobjects: kfree of the reference counter itself is only
legal in the release function.
Previous patch didn't make this clear, document this in code.
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
---
drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_legacy.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_legacy.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_legacy.c
index 4beaee3..a5486e6 100644
--- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_legacy.c
+++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_legacy.c
@@ -216,6 +216,9 @@ static void virtio_pci_release_dev(struct device *_d)
struct virtio_device *vdev = dev_to_virtio(_d);
struct virtio_pci_device *vp_dev = to_vp_device(vdev);
+ /* As struct device is a kobject, it's not safe to
+ * free the memory (including the reference counter itself)
+ * until it's release callback. */
kfree(vp_dev);
}
--
MST
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists