[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150104182656.GC29388@krava.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2015 19:26:56 +0100
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] perf diff: Fix -o/--order option behavior
On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 02:06:33PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
SNIP
> + return 0;
> +
> + fmt = zalloc(sizeof(*fmt));
> + if (fmt == NULL) {
> + pr_err("Memory allocation failed\n");
> + return -1;
> + }
> +
> + fmt->cmp = hist_entry__cmp_nop;
> + fmt->collapse = hist_entry__cmp_nop;
> +
> + switch (compute) {
> + case COMPUTE_DELTA:
> + fmt->sort = hist_entry__cmp_delta_idx;
> + break;
> + case COMPUTE_RATIO:
> + fmt->sort = hist_entry__cmp_ratio_idx;
> + break;
> + case COMPUTE_WEIGHTED_DIFF:
> + fmt->sort = hist_entry__cmp_wdiff_idx;
> + break;
> + default:
> + BUG_ON(1);
> + }
> +
> + list_add(&fmt->sort_list, &perf_hpp__sort_list);
> + return 0;
so the first 'fmt' which gets to sorting is the one for
data__files[sort_idx] file, that sounds good..
but as the sorting goes through all the perf_hpp__sort_list list,
it will hit the 'sort_idx' data again.. should you disable sort
function for its 'fmt' then?
jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists