[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150105103547.40ef87fd@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 10:35:47 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: linux-next: bad commit in the luto-misc tree
Hi Andy,
I noticed commit 7d032e5b1042 ("[TEST ONLY] Force RCU NMI nesting") has
no Signed-off-by ... I understand that this is for testing, but that
is *not* what linux-next is really for. Especially given that that
commit is x86 only, it should be used for unit testing. not a wider
audience like this.
I am also not sure about 9f29ed3365cd ("[DO NOT APPLY] rcu: Make
rcu_nmi_enter() handle nesting") ... (it is, in particular, not
Signed-off-by the committer, you).
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists