[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54A93CBD.7090905@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2015 14:14:37 +0100
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Subject: [PATCH 8/13] ASoC: Intel: Delete an unnecessary check before the
function call "release_firmware"
From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2015 19:49:37 +0100
The release_firmware() function tests whether its argument is NULL and then
returns immediately. Thus the test around the call is not needed.
This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
---
sound/soc/intel/sst/sst_loader.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/intel/sst/sst_loader.c b/sound/soc/intel/sst/sst_loader.c
index b580f96..7888cd7 100644
--- a/sound/soc/intel/sst/sst_loader.c
+++ b/sound/soc/intel/sst/sst_loader.c
@@ -324,8 +324,7 @@ void sst_firmware_load_cb(const struct firmware *fw, void *context)
if (ctx->sst_state != SST_RESET ||
ctx->fw_in_mem != NULL) {
- if (fw != NULL)
- release_firmware(fw);
+ release_firmware(fw);
mutex_unlock(&ctx->sst_lock);
return;
}
--
2.2.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists