lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150105095948.0612e7bc@mschwide>
Date:	Mon, 5 Jan 2015 09:59:48 +0100
From:	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
To:	Chen Gang <gang.chen@...rus.com.cn>
Cc:	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>, linux390@...ibm.com,
	holzheu@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] s390: include: timex: Use macro CLOCK_STORE_SIZE
 instead of hard code number

On Sat, 03 Jan 2015 11:44:04 +0800
Chen Gang <gang.chen@...rus.com.cn> wrote:

> 
> Thank you for your work.
> 
> In honest, originally, I was not sure whether it would cause bug (do not
> know gcc would generic incorrect code for it). :-)

Even if the code happened to be correct it does not matter. The intention
of the sizeof() has been to get to the correct 16, not 8. The fix is
fine as it is.

-- 
blue skies,
   Martin.

"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ