[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54AA6BEB.9060207@broadcom.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 11:48:11 +0100
From: Arend van Spriel <arend@...adcom.com>
To: "Fu, Zhonghui" <zhonghui.fu@...ux.intel.com>
CC: <brudley@...adcom.com>, Franky Lin <frankyl@...adcom.com>,
<meuleman@...adcom.com>, <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
<linville@...driver.com>, <pieterpg@...adcom.com>,
<hdegoede@...hat.com>, <wens@...e.org>,
<linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
<brcm80211-dev-list@...adcom.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] brcmfmac: avoid duplicated suspend/resume operation
On 01/05/15 03:34, Fu, Zhonghui wrote:
> Hi Arend,
>
> Where to find your patch for this?
Well, we did not submit it. Hence my "Acked-by:" to your patch below.
Regards,
Arend
>
> Thanks,
> Zhonghui
>
> On 2014/12/31 17:56, Arend van Spriel wrote:
>> On 12/31/14 09:20, Fu, Zhonghui wrote:
>>> From e34419970a07bfcd365f9c66bdfa552188a0cd26 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>> From: Zhonghui Fu<zhonghui.fu@...ux.intel.com>
>>> Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2014 21:25:31 +0800
>>> Subject: [PATCH] brcmfmac: avoid duplicated suspend/resume operation
>>>
>>> WiFi chip has 2 SDIO functions, and PM core will trigger
>>> twice suspend/resume operations for one WiFi chip to do
>>> the same things. This patch avoid this case.
>>
>> We have a patch queued up for this as well, but this one looks good enough although I personally prefer container_of() instead of dev_to_sdio_func().
>>
>> Acked-by: Arend van Spriel<arend@...adcom.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Zhonghui Fu<zhonghui.fu@...ux.intel.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++--
>>> 1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c
>>> index 3c06e93..eee7818 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c
>>> @@ -1139,11 +1139,18 @@ void brcmf_sdio_wowl_config(struct device *dev, bool enabled)
>>> static int brcmf_ops_sdio_suspend(struct device *dev)
>>> {
>>> struct brcmf_bus *bus_if = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>>> - struct brcmf_sdio_dev *sdiodev = bus_if->bus_priv.sdio;
>>> + struct brcmf_sdio_dev *sdiodev;
>>> mmc_pm_flag_t sdio_flags;
>>> + struct sdio_func *func = dev_to_sdio_func(dev);
>>>
>>> brcmf_dbg(SDIO, "Enter\n");
>>>
>>> + if (func->num == 2) {
>>> + return 0;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + sdiodev = bus_if->bus_priv.sdio;
>>> +
>>> atomic_set(&sdiodev->suspend, true);
>>>
>>> if (sdiodev->wowl_enabled) {
>>> @@ -1164,9 +1171,17 @@ static int brcmf_ops_sdio_suspend(struct device *dev)
>>> static int brcmf_ops_sdio_resume(struct device *dev)
>>> {
>>> struct brcmf_bus *bus_if = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>>> - struct brcmf_sdio_dev *sdiodev = bus_if->bus_priv.sdio;
>>> + struct brcmf_sdio_dev *sdiodev;
>>> + struct sdio_func *func = dev_to_sdio_func(dev);
>>>
>>> brcmf_dbg(SDIO, "Enter\n");
>>> +
>>> + if (func->num == 2) {
>>> + return 0;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + sdiodev = bus_if->bus_priv.sdio;
>>> +
>>> if (sdiodev->pdata->oob_irq_supported)
>>> disable_irq_wake(sdiodev->pdata->oob_irq_nr);
>>> brcmf_sdio_wd_timer(sdiodev->bus, BRCMF_WD_POLL_MS);
>>> -- 1.7.1
>>>
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists