[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1420459627.5267.7.camel@marge.simpson.net>
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2015 13:07:07 +0100
From: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] sched: skip_clock_update madness
On Mon, 2015-01-05 at 12:50 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 11:49:09AM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > On Mon, 2015-01-05 at 11:18 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > So the big lockup thread got me looking at the skip_clock_update stuff again
> > > and here's what I came up with.
> > >
> > > It seems to build a kernel without generating lockdep splats.
> > >
> > > Mike can you see if it cures the wobblies you were seeing?
> >
> > Nope, those hiccups were production IO beasts from hell staying in the
> > kernel for ages at a time. Watchdog being falsely credited with what is
> > usually dinky wakeup -> switch delta throttled it effectively forever.
>
> OK, It's Monday and I'm still trying to bootstrap my post xmas brain. Is
> that: Nope - can't check, or: Nope - doesn't fix wobblies ?
That's: nope, the boxen that wobbled to death are not at my disposal.
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists